Indonesia vs Macau, China: Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), per

Indonesia
4.44 billion current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Macau, China
605.85 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Indonesia rank
4th
Macau, China rank
7th

Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), per over time

  • Indonesia
  • Macau, China
01.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B198320032023

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports 4.44 billion current LCU per square kilometre against 605.85 million current LCU per square kilometre in Macau, China, a difference of 3.83 billion current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Indonesia's figure about 7.3 times Macau, China's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Macau, China ahead.

Indonesia ranks 4th and Macau, China ranks 7th of 205 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 3 and Macau, China in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Macau, China Difference Ahead
1990s 128.35 million current LCU per square kilometre 335.57 million current LCU per square kilometre 207.22 million current LCU per square kilometre Macau, China
2000s 740.59 million current LCU per square kilometre 399.00 million current LCU per square kilometre 341.59 million current LCU per square kilometre Indonesia
2010s 2.43 billion current LCU per square kilometre 594.95 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.83 billion current LCU per square kilometre Indonesia
2020s 3.86 billion current LCU per square kilometre 567.69 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.29 billion current LCU per square kilometre Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added (current lcu), per, Indonesia or Macau, China?
Indonesia, at 4.44 billion current LCU per square kilometre against 605.85 million current LCU per square kilometre in Macau, China as of 2023.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added (current lcu), per between Indonesia and Macau, China?
3.83 billion current LCU per square kilometre, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Macau, China?
33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Indonesia and Macau, China rank globally for industry (including construction), value added (current lcu), per?
Indonesia ranks 4th and Macau, China ranks 7th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Indonesia vs Macau, China: Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/indonesia/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/indonesia/macao-sar-china/">Indonesia vs Macau, China: Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 8,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.