Finland vs Tunisia: Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), per

Finland
210,873 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
232,212 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland rank
171st
Tunisia rank
168th

Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), per over time

  • Finland
  • Tunisia
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k196519942023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 232,212 current LCU per square kilometre against 210,873 current LCU per square kilometre in Finland, a difference of 21,339 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 49 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Finland ahead.

Finland ranks 171st and Tunisia ranks 168th of 205 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 5 and Tunisia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Tunisia Difference Ahead
1970s 25,978 current LCU per square kilometre 3,864 current LCU per square kilometre 22,114 current LCU per square kilometre Finland
1980s 58,335 current LCU per square kilometre 13,132 current LCU per square kilometre 45,203 current LCU per square kilometre Finland
1990s 94,119 current LCU per square kilometre 31,771 current LCU per square kilometre 62,348 current LCU per square kilometre Finland
2000s 159,666 current LCU per square kilometre 74,512 current LCU per square kilometre 85,154 current LCU per square kilometre Finland
2010s 167,345 current LCU per square kilometre 150,199 current LCU per square kilometre 17,146 current LCU per square kilometre Finland
2020s 204,528 current LCU per square kilometre 207,118 current LCU per square kilometre 2,591 current LCU per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added (current lcu), per, Finland or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 232,212 current LCU per square kilometre against 210,873 current LCU per square kilometre in Finland as of 2023.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added (current lcu), per between Finland and Tunisia?
21,339 current LCU per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Tunisia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Finland and Tunisia rank globally for industry (including construction), value added (current lcu), per?
Finland ranks 171st and Tunisia ranks 168th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Tunisia: Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/finland/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/finland/tunisia/">Finland vs Tunisia: Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 8,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.