Ecuador vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), per

Ecuador
134,792 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
163,551 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
179th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
176th

Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), per over time

  • Ecuador
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196119922023

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 163,551 current LCU per square kilometre against 134,792 current LCU per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 28,759 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.2 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

Ecuador ranks 179th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 176th of 205 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 51,613 current LCU per square kilometre 103,150 current LCU per square kilometre 51,537 current LCU per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 120,861 current LCU per square kilometre 94,267 current LCU per square kilometre 26,594 current LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 120,929 current LCU per square kilometre 137,646 current LCU per square kilometre 16,717 current LCU per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added (current lcu), per, Ecuador or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 163,551 current LCU per square kilometre against 134,792 current LCU per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added (current lcu), per between Ecuador and Turks and Caicos Islands?
28,759 current LCU per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Turks and Caicos Islands?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for industry (including construction), value added (current lcu), per?
Ecuador ranks 179th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 176th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Ecuador vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 8,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.