Costa Rica vs Equatorial Guinea: Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), per

Costa Rica
191.06 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
130.98 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
19th
Equatorial Guinea rank
22nd

Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), per over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Equatorial Guinea
0100.0M200.0M300.0M196119922023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 191.06 million current LCU per square kilometre against 130.98 million current LCU per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 60.09 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.5 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 19th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 22nd of 205 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Equatorial Guinea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 68.08 million current LCU per square kilometre 198.50 million current LCU per square kilometre 130.42 million current LCU per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 115.33 million current LCU per square kilometre 206.35 million current LCU per square kilometre 91.02 million current LCU per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 171.71 million current LCU per square kilometre 128.87 million current LCU per square kilometre 42.84 million current LCU per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added (current lcu), per, Costa Rica or Equatorial Guinea?
Costa Rica, at 191.06 million current LCU per square kilometre against 130.98 million current LCU per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added (current lcu), per between Costa Rica and Equatorial Guinea?
60.09 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Equatorial Guinea?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for industry (including construction), value added (current lcu), per?
Costa Rica ranks 19th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 22nd of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Equatorial Guinea: Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/equatorial-guinea/">Costa Rica vs Equatorial Guinea: Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 8,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.