China vs Nepal: Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), per

China
5.07 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal
4.48 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
86th
Nepal rank
87th

Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), per over time

  • China
  • Nepal
02.0M4.0M6.0M196119922023

How they compare

China currently reports 5.07 million current LCU per square kilometre against 4.48 million current LCU per square kilometre in Nepal, a difference of 587,330 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was China ahead.

China ranks 86th and Nepal ranks 87th of 205 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 5 and Nepal in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 6,752 current LCU per square kilometre 4,772 current LCU per square kilometre 1,980 current LCU per square kilometre China
1970s 14,212 current LCU per square kilometre 9,872 current LCU per square kilometre 4,340 current LCU per square kilometre China
1980s 42,864 current LCU per square kilometre 47,841 current LCU per square kilometre 4,976 current LCU per square kilometre Nepal
1990s 263,809 current LCU per square kilometre 303,682 current LCU per square kilometre 39,873 current LCU per square kilometre Nepal
2000s 975,269 current LCU per square kilometre 697,982 current LCU per square kilometre 277,287 current LCU per square kilometre China
2010s 3.04 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.23 million current LCU per square kilometre 810,106 current LCU per square kilometre China
2020s 4.72 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.89 million current LCU per square kilometre 830,625 current LCU per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added (current lcu), per, China or Nepal?
China, at 5.07 million current LCU per square kilometre against 4.48 million current LCU per square kilometre in Nepal as of 2023.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added (current lcu), per between China and Nepal?
587,330 current LCU per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Nepal?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do China and Nepal rank globally for industry (including construction), value added (current lcu), per?
China ranks 86th and Nepal ranks 87th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Nepal: Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/china/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/china/nepal/">China vs Nepal: Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 8,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.