Jamaica vs Nigeria: Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per

Jamaica
31.63 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Nigeria
37.98 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica rank
33rd
Nigeria rank
30th

Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Jamaica
  • Nigeria
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M50.0M196619942023

How they compare

Nigeria currently reports 37.98 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 31.63 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Jamaica, a difference of 6.35 million constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Nigeria's figure about 1.2 times Jamaica's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Nigeria ahead.

Jamaica ranks 33rd and Nigeria ranks 30th of 196 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 1 and Nigeria in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Nigeria Difference Ahead
1980s 25.82 million constant LCU per square kilometre 27.62 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.80 million constant LCU per square kilometre Nigeria
1990s 32.52 million constant LCU per square kilometre 31.65 million constant LCU per square kilometre 872,090 constant LCU per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 31.66 million constant LCU per square kilometre 37.76 million constant LCU per square kilometre 6.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre Nigeria
2010s 28.24 million constant LCU per square kilometre 46.02 million constant LCU per square kilometre 17.78 million constant LCU per square kilometre Nigeria
2020s 29.78 million constant LCU per square kilometre 36.05 million constant LCU per square kilometre 6.27 million constant LCU per square kilometre Nigeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per, Jamaica or Nigeria?
Nigeria, at 37.98 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 31.63 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Jamaica as of 2023.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per between Jamaica and Nigeria?
6.35 million constant LCU per square kilometre, with Nigeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Nigeria?
43 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2023.
How do Jamaica and Nigeria rank globally for industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per?
Jamaica ranks 33rd and Nigeria ranks 30th of 196 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Nigeria: Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/nigeria/">Jamaica vs Nigeria: Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
197 places, 7,775 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.