Guinea vs Rwanda: Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per

Guinea
114.56 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
165.75 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea rank
21st
Rwanda rank
19th

Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Guinea
  • Rwanda
050.0M100.0M150.0M196519942023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 165.75 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 114.56 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Guinea, a difference of 51.19 million constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.4 times Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 38 shared years of data; in 1986 it was Rwanda ahead.

Guinea ranks 21st and Rwanda ranks 19th of 196 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea Rwanda Difference Ahead
1980s 24.92 million constant LCU per square kilometre 28.83 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.90 million constant LCU per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 31.60 million constant LCU per square kilometre 18.95 million constant LCU per square kilometre 12.64 million constant LCU per square kilometre Guinea
2000s 47.18 million constant LCU per square kilometre 37.73 million constant LCU per square kilometre 9.45 million constant LCU per square kilometre Guinea
2010s 63.71 million constant LCU per square kilometre 88.50 million constant LCU per square kilometre 24.79 million constant LCU per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 104.45 million constant LCU per square kilometre 140.91 million constant LCU per square kilometre 36.46 million constant LCU per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per, Guinea or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 165.75 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 114.56 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per between Guinea and Rwanda?
51.19 million constant LCU per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Rwanda?
38 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2023.
How do Guinea and Rwanda rank globally for industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per?
Guinea ranks 21st and Rwanda ranks 19th of 196 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea vs Rwanda: Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/guinea/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/guinea/rwanda/">Guinea vs Rwanda: Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
197 places, 7,775 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.