Eritrea vs East Timor: Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per
Eritrea
10,946 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2009
East Timor
21,945 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Eritrea rank
193rd
East Timor rank
190th
Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per over time
- Eritrea
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 21,945 constant LCU per square kilometre against 10,946 constant LCU per square kilometre in Eritrea, a difference of 10,999 constant LCU per square kilometre.
That makes East Timor's figure about 2.0 times Eritrea's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2000 it was East Timor ahead.
Eritrea ranks 193rd and East Timor ranks 190th of 196 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per, Eritrea or East Timor?
- East Timor, at 21,945 constant LCU per square kilometre against 10,946 constant LCU per square kilometre in Eritrea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per between Eritrea and East Timor?
- 10,999 constant LCU per square kilometre, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and East Timor?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2009.
- How do Eritrea and East Timor rank globally for industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per?
- Eritrea ranks 193rd and East Timor ranks 190th of 196 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.