Brazil vs Jordan: Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per

Brazil
105,963 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Jordan
120,228 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
167th
Jordan rank
165th

Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Brazil
  • Jordan
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k196119922023

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 120,228 constant LCU per square kilometre against 105,963 constant LCU per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 14,265 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Jordan's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 48 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 167th and Jordan ranks 165th of 196 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 5 and Jordan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Jordan Difference Ahead
1970s 56,051 constant LCU per square kilometre 13,984 constant LCU per square kilometre 42,067 constant LCU per square kilometre Brazil
1980s 66,703 constant LCU per square kilometre 25,438 constant LCU per square kilometre 41,266 constant LCU per square kilometre Brazil
1990s 73,724 constant LCU per square kilometre 34,188 constant LCU per square kilometre 39,536 constant LCU per square kilometre Brazil
2000s 89,936 constant LCU per square kilometre 65,424 constant LCU per square kilometre 24,512 constant LCU per square kilometre Brazil
2010s 106,940 constant LCU per square kilometre 96,880 constant LCU per square kilometre 10,060 constant LCU per square kilometre Brazil
2020s 102,640 constant LCU per square kilometre 112,560 constant LCU per square kilometre 9,920 constant LCU per square kilometre Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per, Brazil or Jordan?
Jordan, at 120,228 constant LCU per square kilometre against 105,963 constant LCU per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per between Brazil and Jordan?
14,265 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Jordan?
48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Jordan rank globally for industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per?
Brazil ranks 167th and Jordan ranks 165th of 196 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Jordan: Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/brazil/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/brazil/jordan/">Brazil vs Jordan: Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
197 places, 7,775 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.