Brazil vs Fiji: Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per

Brazil
105,963 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Fiji
90,854 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
167th
Fiji rank
168th

Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Brazil
  • Fiji
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k120.0k196119922023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 105,963 constant LCU per square kilometre against 90,854 constant LCU per square kilometre in Fiji, a difference of 15,109 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.2 times Fiji's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Fiji ahead.

Brazil ranks 167th and Fiji ranks 168th of 196 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 6 and Fiji in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Fiji Difference Ahead
1960s 19,493 constant LCU per square kilometre 25,961 constant LCU per square kilometre 6,468 constant LCU per square kilometre Fiji
1970s 44,941 constant LCU per square kilometre 33,906 constant LCU per square kilometre 11,034 constant LCU per square kilometre Brazil
1980s 66,703 constant LCU per square kilometre 40,360 constant LCU per square kilometre 26,344 constant LCU per square kilometre Brazil
1990s 73,724 constant LCU per square kilometre 53,547 constant LCU per square kilometre 20,177 constant LCU per square kilometre Brazil
2000s 89,936 constant LCU per square kilometre 69,698 constant LCU per square kilometre 20,239 constant LCU per square kilometre Brazil
2010s 106,940 constant LCU per square kilometre 89,970 constant LCU per square kilometre 16,970 constant LCU per square kilometre Brazil
2020s 102,640 constant LCU per square kilometre 89,002 constant LCU per square kilometre 13,638 constant LCU per square kilometre Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per, Brazil or Fiji?
Brazil, at 105,963 constant LCU per square kilometre against 90,854 constant LCU per square kilometre in Fiji as of 2023.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per between Brazil and Fiji?
15,109 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Fiji?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Fiji rank globally for industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per?
Brazil ranks 167th and Fiji ranks 168th of 196 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Fiji: Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/brazil/fiji/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/brazil/fiji/">Brazil vs Fiji: Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
197 places, 7,775 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.