Australia vs Latvia: Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per

Australia
90,255 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia
89,226 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
169th
Latvia rank
170th

Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Australia
  • Latvia
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k199020062023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 90,255 constant LCU per square kilometre against 89,226 constant LCU per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 1,029 constant LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Latvia ahead.

Australia ranks 169th and Latvia ranks 170th of 196 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 48,464 constant LCU per square kilometre 55,899 constant LCU per square kilometre 7,435 constant LCU per square kilometre Latvia
2000s 59,018 constant LCU per square kilometre 85,419 constant LCU per square kilometre 26,401 constant LCU per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 75,558 constant LCU per square kilometre 85,086 constant LCU per square kilometre 9,527 constant LCU per square kilometre Latvia
2020s 84,019 constant LCU per square kilometre 93,748 constant LCU per square kilometre 9,729 constant LCU per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per, Australia or Latvia?
Australia, at 90,255 constant LCU per square kilometre against 89,226 constant LCU per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per between Australia and Latvia?
1,029 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Latvia?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Australia and Latvia rank globally for industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per?
Australia ranks 169th and Latvia ranks 170th of 196 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Latvia: Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/australia/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/australia/latvia/">Australia vs Latvia: Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
197 places, 7,775 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.