Late-demographic dividend vs Qatar: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$)

Late-demographic dividend
0.3162 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Qatar
0.4539 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Late-demographic dividend rank
7th
Qatar rank
8th

Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Late-demographic dividend
  • Qatar
0.511.52196019922025

How they compare

Qatar currently reports 0.4539 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.3162 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Late-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.1377 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Qatar's figure about 1.4 times Late-demographic dividend's.

Across all 46 years both countries report, Qatar has been ahead every year.

Late-demographic dividend ranks 7th and Qatar ranks 8th of 45 groups.

Qatar has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Late-demographic dividend Qatar Difference Ahead
1980s 0.8426 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.41 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.5697 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Qatar
1990s 0.6861 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.64 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9586 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Qatar
2000s 0.5612 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9549 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3937 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Qatar
2010s 0.3442 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.53 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1858 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Qatar
2020s 0.3241 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.482 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1579 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Qatar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$), Late-demographic dividend or Qatar?
Qatar, at 0.4539 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.3162 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Late-demographic dividend as of 2025.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$) between Late-demographic dividend and Qatar?
0.1377 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Qatar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Late-demographic dividend and Qatar?
46 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2025.
How do Late-demographic dividend and Qatar rank globally for industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Late-demographic dividend ranks 7th and Qatar ranks 8th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Late-demographic dividend vs Qatar: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/late-demographic-dividend/qatar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/late-demographic-dividend/qatar/">Late-demographic dividend vs Qatar: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,357 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.