Jordan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$)

Jordan
0.2502 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Tanzania, United Republic of
0.2556 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Jordan rank
53rd
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
51st

Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Jordan
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
0.20.40.60.8197620002025

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 0.2556 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.2502 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Jordan, a difference of 0.0054 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Jordan ahead.

Jordan ranks 53rd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 51st of 195 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 3 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 0.6513 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.311 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3403 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Jordan
2000s 0.5726 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.275 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2975 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Jordan
2010s 0.2899 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2487 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0412 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Jordan
2020s 0.2557 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2616 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0058 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$), Jordan or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 0.2556 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.2502 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Jordan as of 2025.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$) between Jordan and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.0054 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Tanzania, United Republic of?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Jordan and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Jordan ranks 53rd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 51st of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/jordan/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/jordan/tanzania/">Jordan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,357 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.