Japan vs Pre-demographic dividend: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$)

Japan
0.3156 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Pre-demographic dividend
0.2402 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Japan rank
28th
Pre-demographic dividend rank
25th

Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Japan
  • Pre-demographic dividend
0.20.40.60.8198120032025

How they compare

Japan currently reports 0.3156 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.2402 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Pre-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.0754 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Japan's figure about 1.3 times Pre-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Pre-demographic dividend ahead.

Japan ranks 28th and Pre-demographic dividend ranks 25th of 195 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 1 and Pre-demographic dividend in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan Pre-demographic dividend Difference Ahead
1990s 0.2579 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.5579 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Pre-demographic dividend
2000s 0.2607 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.4996 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2389 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Pre-demographic dividend
2010s 0.2475 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2578 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0103 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Pre-demographic dividend
2020s 0.2931 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2269 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0662 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$), Japan or Pre-demographic dividend?
Japan, at 0.3156 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.2402 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Pre-demographic dividend as of 2024.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$) between Japan and Pre-demographic dividend?
0.0754 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Pre-demographic dividend?
31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.
How do Japan and Pre-demographic dividend rank globally for industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Japan ranks 28th and Pre-demographic dividend ranks 25th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Japan vs Pre-demographic dividend: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/japan/pre-demographic-dividend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/japan/pre-demographic-dividend/">Japan vs Pre-demographic dividend: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,357 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.