Europe & Central Asia vs Papua New Guinea: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$)

Europe & Central Asia
0.1697 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Papua New Guinea
0.2738 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Europe & Central Asia rank
40th
Papua New Guinea rank
40th

Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Europe & Central Asia
  • Papua New Guinea
00.10.20.30.4199120082025

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 0.2738 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.1697 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia, a difference of 0.1041 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.6 times Europe & Central Asia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Europe & Central Asia ranks 40th and Papua New Guinea ranks 40th of 45 groups.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 0.2207 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3756 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1548 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Papua New Guinea
2010s 0.2126 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3071 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0945 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Papua New Guinea
2020s 0.2024 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2841 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0817 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$), Europe & Central Asia or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 0.2738 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.1697 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia as of 2024.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$) between Europe & Central Asia and Papua New Guinea?
0.1041 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia and Papua New Guinea?
19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
How do Europe & Central Asia and Papua New Guinea rank globally for industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Europe & Central Asia ranks 40th and Papua New Guinea ranks 40th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia vs Papua New Guinea: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/europe-and-central-asia/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/europe-and-central-asia/papua-new-guinea/">Europe & Central Asia vs Papua New Guinea: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,357 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.