Nicaragua vs Sao Tome and Principe: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$)

Nicaragua
34,257 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
36,616 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua rank
140th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
137th

Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Nicaragua
  • Sao Tome and Principe
10.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119922023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 36,616 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 34,257 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Nicaragua, a difference of 2,359 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.1 times Nicaragua's.

Across all 16 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.

Nicaragua ranks 140th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 137th of 193 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nicaragua Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
2000s 17,334 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 23,037 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,703 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 24,653 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 30,007 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,354 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 31,175 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 36,304 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,129 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$), Nicaragua or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 36,616 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 34,257 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Nicaragua as of 2023.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$) between Nicaragua and Sao Tome and Principe?
2,359 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Sao Tome and Principe?
16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
How do Nicaragua and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Nicaragua ranks 140th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 137th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nicaragua vs Sao Tome and Principe: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/nicaragua/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/nicaragua/sao-tome-and-principe/">Nicaragua vs Sao Tome and Principe: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
238 places, 9,791 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.