Mozambique vs Suriname: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$)

Mozambique
5,230 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
6,899 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique rank
183rd
Suriname rank
181st

Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Mozambique
  • Suriname
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k197519992023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 6,899 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 5,230 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Mozambique, a difference of 1,669 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.3 times Mozambique's.

Across all 40 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.

Mozambique ranks 183rd and Suriname ranks 181st of 193 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique Suriname Difference Ahead
1980s 439.74 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,695 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,255 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Suriname
1990s 466.5 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,915 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,448 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Suriname
2000s 1,724 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,315 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,591 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Suriname
2010s 3,613 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 8,812 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,199 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Suriname
2020s 4,629 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,914 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,285 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$), Mozambique or Suriname?
Suriname, at 6,899 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 5,230 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Mozambique as of 2023.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$) between Mozambique and Suriname?
1,669 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Suriname?
40 years are reported by both, from 1984 to 2023.
How do Mozambique and Suriname rank globally for industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Mozambique ranks 183rd and Suriname ranks 181st of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mozambique vs Suriname: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/mozambique/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/mozambique/suriname/">Mozambique vs Suriname: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
238 places, 9,791 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.