Malaysia vs Viet Nam: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$)

Malaysia
438,359 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Viet Nam
434,963 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malaysia rank
50th
Viet Nam rank
51st

Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Malaysia
  • Viet Nam
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k197019962023

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 438,359 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 434,963 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Viet Nam, a difference of 3,396 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

Across all 39 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.

Malaysia ranks 50th and Viet Nam ranks 51st of 193 countries.

Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malaysia Viet Nam Difference Ahead
1980s 91,074 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 32,676 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 58,398 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Malaysia
1990s 164,291 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 61,527 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 102,765 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Malaysia
2000s 263,734 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 157,085 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 106,649 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Malaysia
2010s 344,429 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 260,883 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 83,546 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Malaysia
2020s 414,979 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 404,677 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 10,302 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$), Malaysia or Viet Nam?
Malaysia, at 438,359 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 434,963 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Viet Nam as of 2023.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$) between Malaysia and Viet Nam?
3,396 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Viet Nam?
39 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2023.
How do Malaysia and Viet Nam rank globally for industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Malaysia ranks 50th and Viet Nam ranks 51st of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malaysia vs Viet Nam: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/malaysia/viet-nam/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/malaysia/viet-nam/">Malaysia vs Viet Nam: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
238 places, 9,791 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.