Macau, China vs Singapore: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$)

Macau, China
63.85 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
140.15 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Macau, China rank
2nd
Singapore rank
1st

Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Macau, China
  • Singapore
050.0M100.0M150.0M196119922023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 140.15 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 63.85 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Macau, China, a difference of 76.31 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Singapore's figure about 2.2 times Macau, China's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Macau, China ahead.

Macau, China ranks 2nd and Singapore ranks 1st of 193 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Macau, China averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Macau, China Singapore Difference Ahead
2000s 102.84 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 76.42 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 26.42 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
2010s 79.89 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 108.12 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 28.23 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 62.35 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 134.94 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 72.60 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$), Macau, China or Singapore?
Singapore, at 140.15 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 63.85 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Macau, China as of 2023.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$) between Macau, China and Singapore?
76.31 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Macau, China and Singapore?
16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
How do Macau, China and Singapore rank globally for industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Macau, China ranks 2nd and Singapore ranks 1st of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Macau, China vs Singapore: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/macao-sar-china/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/macao-sar-china/singapore/">Macau, China vs Singapore: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
238 places, 9,791 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.