Jamaica vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$)

Jamaica
270,436 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
284,431 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica rank
66th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
65th

Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Jamaica
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k300.0k196619942023

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 284,431 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 270,436 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Jamaica, a difference of 13,995 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.1 times Jamaica's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Jamaica ahead.

Jamaica ranks 66th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 65th of 193 countries.

Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 267,693 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 175,229 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 92,464 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 241,420 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 126,237 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 115,183 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2020s 254,583 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 241,339 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 13,244 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$), Jamaica or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 284,431 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 270,436 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Jamaica as of 2023.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$) between Jamaica and Turks and Caicos Islands?
13,995 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Turks and Caicos Islands?
17 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2023.
How do Jamaica and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Jamaica ranks 66th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 65th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Jamaica vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
238 places, 9,791 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.