Guatemala vs Uzbekistan: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$)

Guatemala
167,102 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Uzbekistan
179,073 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
78th
Uzbekistan rank
76th

Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Guatemala
  • Uzbekistan
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196119922023

How they compare

Uzbekistan currently reports 179,073 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 167,102 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 11,971 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 78th and Uzbekistan ranks 76th of 193 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 3 and Uzbekistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1990s 76,706 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 16,948 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 59,758 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 100,430 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 21,069 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 79,360 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 127,636 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 64,926 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 62,711 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 158,586 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 163,262 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,676 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Uzbekistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$), Guatemala or Uzbekistan?
Uzbekistan, at 179,073 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 167,102 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$) between Guatemala and Uzbekistan?
11,971 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Uzbekistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Uzbekistan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Uzbekistan rank globally for industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Guatemala ranks 78th and Uzbekistan ranks 76th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Uzbekistan: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/uzbekistan/">Guatemala vs Uzbekistan: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
238 places, 9,791 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.