Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$)
Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) over time
- Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
- United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
How they compare
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland currently reports 2.27 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 103,500 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), a difference of 2.16 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.
That makes United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland's figure about 21.9 times Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)'s.
Across all 34 years both countries report, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has been ahead every year.
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 23rd and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 21st of 45 groups.
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 84,529 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 1.88 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 1.80 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
| 2000s | 43,901 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 2.25 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 2.20 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
| 2010s | 73,982 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 2.16 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 2.09 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
| 2020s | 98,151 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 2.28 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 2.18 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$), Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, at 2.27 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 103,500 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$) between Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- 2.16 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$)?
- Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 23rd and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 21st of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.