East Asia & Pacific vs Macau, China: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$)

East Asia & Pacific
431,238 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Macau, China
63.85 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
East Asia & Pacific rank
5th
Macau, China rank
2nd

Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • East Asia & Pacific
  • Macau, China
025.0M50.0M75.0M100.0M125.0M196119922023

How they compare

Macau, China currently reports 63.85 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 431,238 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 63.41 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Macau, China's figure about 148.1 times East Asia & Pacific's.

Across all 16 years both countries report, Macau, China has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific ranks 5th and Macau, China ranks 2nd of 45 groups.

Macau, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific Macau, China Difference Ahead
2000s 221,044 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 102.84 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 102.62 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
2010s 314,887 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 79.89 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 79.58 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
2020s 409,916 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 62.35 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 61.94 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Macau, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$), East Asia & Pacific or Macau, China?
Macau, China, at 63.85 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 431,238 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific as of 2023.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$) between East Asia & Pacific and Macau, China?
63.41 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Macau, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Macau, China?
16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
How do East Asia & Pacific and Macau, China rank globally for industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$)?
East Asia & Pacific ranks 5th and Macau, China ranks 2nd of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific vs Macau, China: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific/macao-sar-china/">East Asia & Pacific vs Macau, China: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
238 places, 9,791 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.