How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Oman?

26 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Cuba vs Oman: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$)

Cuba

146,180 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre

in 2023

Oman

150,023 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre

in 2023

Cuba rank

87th

Oman rank

85th

Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

Cuba
Oman

How they compare

Oman currently reports 150,023 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 146,180 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 3,843 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 87th and Oman ranks 85th of 193 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Cuba	Oman	Difference	Ahead
1990s	105,794 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	84,281 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	21,513 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	Cuba
2000s	134,310 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	94,215 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	40,096 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	Cuba
2010s	177,182 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	131,270 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	45,912 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	Cuba
2020s	156,158 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	144,050 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	12,108 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$), Cuba or Oman?: Oman, at 150,023 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 146,180 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$) between Cuba and Oman?: 3,843 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Oman ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Oman?: 26 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Oman rank globally for industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$)?: Cuba ranks 87th and Oman ranks 85th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Oman: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/oman/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/oman/">Cuba vs Oman: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit: constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 238 places, 9,791 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 01 September 2026

Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.