Cuba vs Egypt: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$)

Cuba
146,180 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Egypt
149,012 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
87th
Egypt rank
86th

Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Cuba
  • Egypt
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196119922023

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 149,012 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 146,180 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 2,832 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 87th and Egypt ranks 86th of 193 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Egypt Difference Ahead
1970s 86,595 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 11,652 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 74,943 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 142,125 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 30,753 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 111,372 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 107,583 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 52,125 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 55,458 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 134,310 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 83,798 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 50,513 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 177,182 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 121,739 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 55,442 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 156,158 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 145,254 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 10,904 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$), Cuba or Egypt?
Egypt, at 149,012 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 146,180 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$) between Cuba and Egypt?
2,832 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Egypt?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Egypt rank globally for industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Cuba ranks 87th and Egypt ranks 86th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Egypt: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/egypt-arab-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/egypt-arab-rep/">Cuba vs Egypt: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
238 places, 9,791 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.