Congo vs Zimbabwe: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$)

Congo
13,846 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
16,317 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
170th
Zimbabwe rank
167th

Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Congo
  • Zimbabwe
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 16,317 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 13,846 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 2,471 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 38 shared years of data; in 1986 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Congo ranks 170th and Zimbabwe ranks 167th of 193 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s 6,961 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 13,364 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,403 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 9,243 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 15,351 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,107 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 12,289 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 10,918 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,370 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Congo
2010s 16,232 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 12,825 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,407 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Congo
2020s 13,930 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 15,397 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,467 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$), Congo or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 16,317 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 13,846 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$) between Congo and Zimbabwe?
2,471 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Zimbabwe?
38 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2023.
How do Congo and Zimbabwe rank globally for industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Congo ranks 170th and Zimbabwe ranks 167th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Zimbabwe: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/zimbabwe/">Congo vs Zimbabwe: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
238 places, 9,791 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.