How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Latvia?

29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Latvia: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$)

Chile

91,553 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre

in 2023

Latvia

87,768 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre

in 2023

Chile rank

104th

Latvia rank

105th

Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

Chile
Latvia

How they compare

Chile currently reports 91,553 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 87,768 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 3,785 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 104th and Latvia ranks 105th of 193 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Latvia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	66,998 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	54,985 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	12,013 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	Chile
2000s	75,643 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	84,022 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	8,380 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	Latvia
2010s	88,690 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	83,695 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	4,995 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	Chile
2020s	90,898 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	92,215 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	1,318 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$), Chile or Latvia?: Chile, at 91,553 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 87,768 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$) between Chile and Latvia?: 3,785 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Latvia?: 29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Chile and Latvia rank globally for industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$)?: Chile ranks 104th and Latvia ranks 105th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Latvia: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/latvia/">Chile vs Latvia: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit: constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 238 places, 9,791 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 01 September 2026

Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.