Chile vs Eswatini: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$)

Chile
91,553 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
95,409 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
104th
Eswatini rank
101st

Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Chile
  • Eswatini
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 95,409 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 91,553 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 3,856 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 53 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 104th and Eswatini ranks 101st of 193 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 5 and Eswatini in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Eswatini Difference Ahead
1970s 26,888 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 8,634 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 18,255 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Chile
1980s 33,103 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 18,138 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 14,965 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Chile
1990s 57,880 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 45,676 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 12,204 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Chile
2000s 75,643 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 61,695 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 13,948 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Chile
2010s 88,690 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 83,577 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,112 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Chile
2020s 90,898 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 92,900 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,002 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$), Chile or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 95,409 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 91,553 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$) between Chile and Eswatini?
3,856 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Eswatini?
53 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
How do Chile and Eswatini rank globally for industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Chile ranks 104th and Eswatini ranks 101st of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Eswatini: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/eswatini/">Chile vs Eswatini: Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
238 places, 9,791 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.