Japan vs Montenegro: Industry (including construction), value added
Industry (including construction), value added over time
- Japan
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports -3.2% against -4.6% in Japan, a difference of 1.4%.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Montenegro ahead.
Japan ranks 183rd and Montenegro ranks 181st of 197 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.9% | 0.5% | 1.4% | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 2.1% | 3.9% | 1.8% | Montenegro |
| 2020s | -1.0% | -1.6% | 0.6% | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher industry (including construction), value added, Japan or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at -3.2% against -4.6% in Japan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added between Japan and Montenegro?
- 1.4%, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Montenegro?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Japan and Montenegro rank globally for industry (including construction), value added?
- Japan ranks 183rd and Montenegro ranks 181st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Industry (including construction), value added (annual % growth). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Industry (including construction) corresponds to ISIC (Rev.4) divisions 05-43. It is comprised of mining, manufacturing, construction, electricity, water, and gas industries. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.