East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Rwanda: Industry (including construction), value added

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
4.4%
in 2025
Rwanda
11.2%
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
15th
Rwanda rank
15th

Industry (including construction), value added over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Rwanda
-75-50-2502550196119932025

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 11.2% against 4.4% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 6.8%.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 2.5 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 23 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1966 it was East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ahead.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 15th and Rwanda ranks 15th of 45 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) averaged higher in 5 and Rwanda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 7.5% 2.1% 5.4% East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
1970s 10.3% 3.9% 6.4% East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
1980s 7.7% 4.9% 2.7% East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
1990s 10.3% 4.2% 6.0% East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
2000s 9.6% 8.8% 0.8% East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
2010s 7.0% 8.9% 1.8% Rwanda
2020s 4.2% 8.3% 4.1% Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 11.2% against 4.4% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2025.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Rwanda?
6.8%, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Rwanda?
60 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2025.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Rwanda rank globally for industry (including construction), value added?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 15th and Rwanda ranks 15th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Industry (including construction), value added (annual % growth). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Rwanda: Industry (including construction), value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-annual-percent-growth/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-annual-percent-growth/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/rwanda/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Rwanda: Industry (including construction), value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added (annual % growth)
Unit
annual % growth
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
245 places, 10,277 data points, 1961–2025
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction) corresponds to ISIC (Rev.4) divisions 05-43. It is comprised of mining, manufacturing, construction, electricity, water, and gas industries. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.