East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Grenada: Industry (including construction), value added

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
4.4%
in 2025
Grenada
10.8%
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
15th
Grenada rank
18th

Industry (including construction), value added over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Grenada
-200204060196119932025

How they compare

Grenada currently reports 10.8% against 4.4% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 6.4%.

That makes Grenada's figure about 2.5 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 19 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1978 it was East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ahead.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 15th and Grenada ranks 18th of 45 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) averaged higher in 4 and Grenada in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Grenada Difference Ahead
1970s 9.8% 11.6% 1.8% Grenada
1980s 7.7% 5.7% 2.0% East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
1990s 10.3% 5.6% 4.6% East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
2000s 9.6% 3.0% 6.6% East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
2010s 7.0% 3.1% 3.9% East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
2020s 4.2% 4.7% 0.5% Grenada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Grenada?
Grenada, at 10.8% against 4.4% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2025.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Grenada?
6.4%, with Grenada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Grenada?
48 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 2025.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Grenada rank globally for industry (including construction), value added?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 15th and Grenada ranks 18th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Industry (including construction), value added (annual % growth). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Grenada: Industry (including construction), value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-annual-percent-growth/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/grenada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-annual-percent-growth/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/grenada/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Grenada: Industry (including construction), value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added (annual % growth)
Unit
annual % growth
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
245 places, 10,277 data points, 1961–2025
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction) corresponds to ISIC (Rev.4) divisions 05-43. It is comprised of mining, manufacturing, construction, electricity, water, and gas industries. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.