Japan vs North Macedonia: Income - Regions — Disposable income, net
Income - Regions — Disposable income, net over time
- Japan
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 106.51 Index against 105.19 Index in Japan, a difference of 1.32 Index.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 48th and North Macedonia ranks 45th of 50 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 2 and North Macedonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 103.23 Index | 79.81 Index | 23.42 Index | Japan |
| 2010s | 99.29 Index | 99.14 Index | 0.1523 Index | Japan |
| 2020s | 101.89 Index | 105.45 Index | 3.57 Index | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher income - regions — disposable income, net, Japan or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 106.51 Index against 105.19 Index in Japan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in income - regions — disposable income, net between Japan and North Macedonia?
- 1.32 Index, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and North Macedonia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Japan and North Macedonia rank globally for income - regions — disposable income, net?
- Japan ranks 48th and North Macedonia ranks 45th of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Income - Regions — Disposable income, net. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides indicators on disposable income and primary income, in large regions (TL2) and small regions (TL3) when available. Data source and definition Income here is measured from the macro perspective produced by the regional accounts. Income data is collected from Eurostat for EU countries and via delegates of the OECD Working Party on Territorial Indicators (WPTI), as well as from national statistical offices' websites. In order to allow comparability over time and across countries, income in current prices are transformed into constant prices and PPP measures. For the income series, the deflator retained is the national 'implicit national price index of households final consumption expenditure', which is the deflator used in SNA for the transaction P31S14. See the Regional data sources. Definition of regions Regions are subnational units below national boundaries. OECD countries have two regional levels: large regions (territorial level 2 or TL2) and small regions (territorial level 3 or TL3). See the OECD Territorial grid. Use of economic data on small regions TL3 regions are grouped into typologies based on shared characteristics. For economic analysis, TL3 regions belonging to the same Functional Urban Area (FUA) with more than 250,000 inhabitants are aggregated into a single metropolitan region to reduce distortions from commuting. See the OECD Territorial Correspondence Table. Cite this dataset OECD Regions, Cities and Local Areas database http://oe.cd/geostats. Further information OECD Regions and Cities Statistical Atlas OECD Regions and Cities at a Glance For questions and/or comments, please email RegionStat@oecd.org.