Ecuador vs Tunisia: Imports of goods, services and primary income (BoP, current US$), per

Ecuador
154,611 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
155,225 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
121st
Tunisia rank
119th

Imports of goods, services and primary income (BoP, current US$), per over time

  • Ecuador
  • Tunisia
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k197619992023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 155,225 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 154,611 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 614 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

Across all 48 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 121st and Tunisia ranks 119th of 198 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Tunisia Difference Ahead
1970s 8,209 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 15,567 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 7,358 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1980s 12,735 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 27,027 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 14,293 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 21,013 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 55,327 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 34,314 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 53,700 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 110,811 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 57,110 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 111,185 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 161,496 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 50,312 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 131,831 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 136,270 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 4,439 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imports of goods, services and primary income (bop, current us$), per, Ecuador or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 155,225 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 154,611 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in imports of goods, services and primary income (bop, current us$), per between Ecuador and Tunisia?
614 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Tunisia?
48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Tunisia rank globally for imports of goods, services and primary income (bop, current us$), per?
Ecuador ranks 121st and Tunisia ranks 119th of 198 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of goods, services and primary income (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Tunisia: Imports of goods, services and primary income (BoP, current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-services-and-primary-income-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-services-and-primary-income-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/tunisia/">Ecuador vs Tunisia: Imports of goods, services and primary income (BoP, current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Imports of goods, services and primary income (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
245 places, 9,368 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Imports of goods, services and primary income (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.