Ecuador vs Iceland: Imports of goods, services and primary income (BoP, current US$), per

Ecuador
154,611 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
151,070 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
121st
Iceland rank
123rd

Imports of goods, services and primary income (BoP, current US$), per over time

  • Ecuador
  • Iceland
050.0k100.0k150.0k197619992023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 154,611 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 151,070 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 3,541 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Iceland ahead.

Ecuador ranks 121st and Iceland ranks 123rd of 198 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Iceland in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Iceland Difference Ahead
1970s 8,209 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 8,402 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 193.33 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 12,735 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 15,589 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,854 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 21,013 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 26,838 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 5,825 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 53,700 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 79,685 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 25,985 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 111,185 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 96,649 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 14,535 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 131,831 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 120,159 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 11,672 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imports of goods, services and primary income (bop, current us$), per, Ecuador or Iceland?
Ecuador, at 154,611 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 151,070 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in imports of goods, services and primary income (bop, current us$), per between Ecuador and Iceland?
3,541 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Iceland?
48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Iceland rank globally for imports of goods, services and primary income (bop, current us$), per?
Ecuador ranks 121st and Iceland ranks 123rd of 198 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of goods, services and primary income (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Iceland: Imports of goods, services and primary income (BoP, current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-services-and-primary-income-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-services-and-primary-income-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/iceland/">Ecuador vs Iceland: Imports of goods, services and primary income (BoP, current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Imports of goods, services and primary income (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
245 places, 9,368 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Imports of goods, services and primary income (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.