Congo vs Tanzania: Imports of goods, services and primary income (BoP, current US$), per

Congo
18,149 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Tanzania
20,233 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
178th
Tanzania rank
175th

Imports of goods, services and primary income (BoP, current US$), per over time

  • Congo
  • Tanzania
010.0k20.0k30.0k197619992023

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 20,233 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 18,149 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 2,084 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Tanzania's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1978 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 178th and Tanzania ranks 175th of 198 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Tanzania Difference Ahead
1970s 1,872 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,400 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 471.32 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Congo
1980s 4,064 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,431 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,633 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Congo
1990s 5,484 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,370 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,114 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2000s 13,393 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 5,360 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 8,032 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2010s 24,257 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 13,780 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 10,477 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2020s 14,006 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 13,226 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 779.93 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imports of goods, services and primary income (bop, current us$), per, Congo or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 20,233 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 18,149 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in imports of goods, services and primary income (bop, current us$), per between Congo and Tanzania?
2,084 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Tanzania?
42 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 2021.
How do Congo and Tanzania rank globally for imports of goods, services and primary income (bop, current us$), per?
Congo ranks 178th and Tanzania ranks 175th of 198 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of goods, services and primary income (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Tanzania: Imports of goods, services and primary income (BoP, current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-services-and-primary-income-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-services-and-primary-income-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/tanzania/">Congo vs Tanzania: Imports of goods, services and primary income (BoP, current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Imports of goods, services and primary income (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
245 places, 9,368 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Imports of goods, services and primary income (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.