Cape Verde vs China: Imports of goods, services and primary income (BoP, current US$), per

Cape Verde
372,020 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
China
385,343 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cape Verde rank
90th
China rank
87th

Imports of goods, services and primary income (BoP, current US$), per over time

  • Cape Verde
  • China
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k197720002023

How they compare

China currently reports 385,343 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 372,020 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Cape Verde, a difference of 13,323 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1982 it was Cape Verde ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 90th and China ranks 87th of 198 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 4 and China in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde China Difference Ahead
1980s 28,971 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,903 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 25,068 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
1990s 61,475 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 11,820 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 49,655 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2000s 184,006 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 70,411 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 113,595 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2010s 313,572 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 248,971 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 64,601 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2020s 316,473 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 361,450 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 44,976 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imports of goods, services and primary income (bop, current us$), per, Cape Verde or China?
China, at 385,343 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 372,020 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Cape Verde as of 2023.
What is the difference in imports of goods, services and primary income (bop, current us$), per between Cape Verde and China?
13,323 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and China?
42 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2023.
How do Cape Verde and China rank globally for imports of goods, services and primary income (bop, current us$), per?
Cape Verde ranks 90th and China ranks 87th of 198 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of goods, services and primary income (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs China: Imports of goods, services and primary income (BoP, current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-services-and-primary-income-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-services-and-primary-income-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/china/">Cape Verde vs China: Imports of goods, services and primary income (BoP, current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Imports of goods, services and primary income (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
245 places, 9,368 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Imports of goods, services and primary income (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.