Nicaragua vs Pakistan: Imports of goods and services (current US$), per square kilometre

Nicaragua
87,525 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
78,501 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua rank
123rd
Pakistan rank
126th

Imports of goods and services (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Nicaragua
  • Pakistan
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k196119922023

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 87,525 current US$ per square kilometre against 78,501 current US$ per square kilometre in Pakistan, a difference of 9,024 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.1 times Pakistan's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Pakistan ahead.

Nicaragua ranks 123rd and Pakistan ranks 126th of 190 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Nicaragua averaged higher in 2 and Pakistan in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nicaragua Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 1,263 current US$ per square kilometre 1,068 current US$ per square kilometre 195.65 current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
1970s 4,067 current US$ per square kilometre 2,651 current US$ per square kilometre 1,416 current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
1980s 6,860 current US$ per square kilometre 8,698 current US$ per square kilometre 1,838 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1990s 10,092 current US$ per square kilometre 13,991 current US$ per square kilometre 3,899 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2000s 26,531 current US$ per square kilometre 31,967 current US$ per square kilometre 5,437 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2010s 57,127 current US$ per square kilometre 67,118 current US$ per square kilometre 9,991 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2020s 73,225 current US$ per square kilometre 84,260 current US$ per square kilometre 11,035 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imports of goods and services (current us$), per square kilometre, Nicaragua or Pakistan?
Nicaragua, at 87,525 current US$ per square kilometre against 78,501 current US$ per square kilometre in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in imports of goods and services (current us$), per square kilometre between Nicaragua and Pakistan?
9,024 current US$ per square kilometre, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Pakistan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Nicaragua and Pakistan rank globally for imports of goods and services (current us$), per square kilometre?
Nicaragua ranks 123rd and Pakistan ranks 126th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of goods and services (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nicaragua vs Pakistan: Imports of goods and services (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-current-us-per-square-kilometre/nicaragua/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-current-us-per-square-kilometre/nicaragua/pakistan/">Nicaragua vs Pakistan: Imports of goods and services (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Imports of goods and services (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
235 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Imports of goods and services (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.