Nepal vs Uruguay: Imports of goods and services (current US$), per square kilometre

Nepal
98,977 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
110,183 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal rank
120th
Uruguay rank
117th

Imports of goods and services (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Nepal
  • Uruguay
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k196119922023

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 110,183 current US$ per square kilometre against 98,977 current US$ per square kilometre in Nepal, a difference of 11,206 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Uruguay ahead.

Nepal ranks 120th and Uruguay ranks 117th of 190 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nepal Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 529.84 current US$ per square kilometre 1,226 current US$ per square kilometre 696.32 current US$ per square kilometre Uruguay
1970s 1,134 current US$ per square kilometre 3,991 current US$ per square kilometre 2,857 current US$ per square kilometre Uruguay
1980s 3,897 current US$ per square kilometre 8,332 current US$ per square kilometre 4,436 current US$ per square kilometre Uruguay
1990s 9,111 current US$ per square kilometre 19,762 current US$ per square kilometre 10,651 current US$ per square kilometre Uruguay
2000s 18,546 current US$ per square kilometre 32,050 current US$ per square kilometre 13,504 current US$ per square kilometre Uruguay
2010s 62,209 current US$ per square kilometre 78,981 current US$ per square kilometre 16,772 current US$ per square kilometre Uruguay
2020s 99,424 current US$ per square kilometre 93,831 current US$ per square kilometre 5,592 current US$ per square kilometre Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imports of goods and services (current us$), per square kilometre, Nepal or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 110,183 current US$ per square kilometre against 98,977 current US$ per square kilometre in Nepal as of 2023.
What is the difference in imports of goods and services (current us$), per square kilometre between Nepal and Uruguay?
11,206 current US$ per square kilometre, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Uruguay?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Nepal and Uruguay rank globally for imports of goods and services (current us$), per square kilometre?
Nepal ranks 120th and Uruguay ranks 117th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of goods and services (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nepal vs Uruguay: Imports of goods and services (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-current-us-per-square-kilometre/nepal/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-current-us-per-square-kilometre/nepal/uruguay/">Nepal vs Uruguay: Imports of goods and services (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Imports of goods and services (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
235 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Imports of goods and services (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.