Macau, China vs Singapore: Imports of goods and services (current US$), per square kilometre

Macau, China
739.11 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
1.02 billion current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Macau, China rank
2nd
Singapore rank
1st

Imports of goods and services (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Macau, China
  • Singapore
0250.0M500.0M750.0M1.0B196119922023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 1.02 billion current US$ per square kilometre against 739.11 million current US$ per square kilometre in Macau, China, a difference of 280.91 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Singapore's figure about 1.4 times Macau, China's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 42 shared years of data; in 1982 it was Macau, China ahead.

Macau, China ranks 2nd and Singapore ranks 1st of 190 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Macau, China averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Macau, China Singapore Difference Ahead
1980s 78.03 million current US$ per square kilometre 51.54 million current US$ per square kilometre 26.49 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
1990s 166.47 million current US$ per square kilometre 168.11 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.65 million current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 230.58 million current US$ per square kilometre 356.17 million current US$ per square kilometre 125.59 million current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2010s 511.63 million current US$ per square kilometre 703.90 million current US$ per square kilometre 192.27 million current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 649.37 million current US$ per square kilometre 921.66 million current US$ per square kilometre 272.29 million current US$ per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imports of goods and services (current us$), per square kilometre, Macau, China or Singapore?
Singapore, at 1.02 billion current US$ per square kilometre against 739.11 million current US$ per square kilometre in Macau, China as of 2023.
What is the difference in imports of goods and services (current us$), per square kilometre between Macau, China and Singapore?
280.91 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Macau, China and Singapore?
42 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2023.
How do Macau, China and Singapore rank globally for imports of goods and services (current us$), per square kilometre?
Macau, China ranks 2nd and Singapore ranks 1st of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of goods and services (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Macau, China vs Singapore: Imports of goods and services (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-current-us-per-square-kilometre/macao-sar-china/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-current-us-per-square-kilometre/macao-sar-china/singapore/">Macau, China vs Singapore: Imports of goods and services (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Imports of goods and services (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
235 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Imports of goods and services (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.