Macau, China vs Malta: Imports of goods and services (current US$), per square kilometre

Macau, China
739.11 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
71.68 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Macau, China rank
2nd
Malta rank
4th

Imports of goods and services (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Macau, China
  • Malta
0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M197019962023

How they compare

Macau, China currently reports 739.11 million current US$ per square kilometre against 71.68 million current US$ per square kilometre in Malta, a difference of 667.43 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Macau, China's figure about 10.3 times Malta's.

Across all 42 years both countries report, Macau, China has been ahead every year.

Macau, China ranks 2nd and Malta ranks 4th of 190 countries.

Macau, China has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Macau, China Malta Difference Ahead
1980s 78.03 million current US$ per square kilometre 3.64 million current US$ per square kilometre 74.39 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
1990s 166.47 million current US$ per square kilometre 9.17 million current US$ per square kilometre 157.30 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
2000s 230.58 million current US$ per square kilometre 17.22 million current US$ per square kilometre 213.36 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
2010s 511.63 million current US$ per square kilometre 36.88 million current US$ per square kilometre 474.75 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
2020s 649.37 million current US$ per square kilometre 65.14 million current US$ per square kilometre 584.23 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imports of goods and services (current us$), per square kilometre, Macau, China or Malta?
Macau, China, at 739.11 million current US$ per square kilometre against 71.68 million current US$ per square kilometre in Malta as of 2023.
What is the difference in imports of goods and services (current us$), per square kilometre between Macau, China and Malta?
667.43 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Macau, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Macau, China and Malta?
42 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2023.
How do Macau, China and Malta rank globally for imports of goods and services (current us$), per square kilometre?
Macau, China ranks 2nd and Malta ranks 4th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of goods and services (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Macau, China vs Malta: Imports of goods and services (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-current-us-per-square-kilometre/macao-sar-china/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-current-us-per-square-kilometre/macao-sar-china/malta/">Macau, China vs Malta: Imports of goods and services (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Imports of goods and services (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
235 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Imports of goods and services (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.