China vs Sri Lanka: Imports of goods and services (current US$), per square kilometre

China
337,391 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
309,193 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
84th
Sri Lanka rank
85th

Imports of goods and services (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • China
  • Sri Lanka
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119922023

How they compare

China currently reports 337,391 current US$ per square kilometre against 309,193 current US$ per square kilometre in Sri Lanka, a difference of 28,198 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 58 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

China ranks 84th and Sri Lanka ranks 85th of 190 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 175.46 current US$ per square kilometre 6,643 current US$ per square kilometre 6,467 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1970s 765.72 current US$ per square kilometre 16,193 current US$ per square kilometre 15,428 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1980s 3,267 current US$ per square kilometre 36,300 current US$ per square kilometre 33,033 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1990s 11,103 current US$ per square kilometre 83,718 current US$ per square kilometre 72,616 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2000s 67,162 current US$ per square kilometre 160,444 current US$ per square kilometre 93,282 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2010s 239,480 current US$ per square kilometre 398,185 current US$ per square kilometre 158,705 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2020s 316,229 current US$ per square kilometre 313,298 current US$ per square kilometre 2,930 current US$ per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imports of goods and services (current us$), per square kilometre, China or Sri Lanka?
China, at 337,391 current US$ per square kilometre against 309,193 current US$ per square kilometre in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
What is the difference in imports of goods and services (current us$), per square kilometre between China and Sri Lanka?
28,198 current US$ per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Sri Lanka?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and Sri Lanka rank globally for imports of goods and services (current us$), per square kilometre?
China ranks 84th and Sri Lanka ranks 85th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of goods and services (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Sri Lanka: Imports of goods and services (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-current-us-per-square-kilometre/china/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-current-us-per-square-kilometre/china/sri-lanka/">China vs Sri Lanka: Imports of goods and services (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Imports of goods and services (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
235 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Imports of goods and services (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.