Australia vs Uganda: Imports of goods and services (current US$), per square kilometre

Australia
50,381 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
52,874 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
138th
Uganda rank
137th

Imports of goods and services (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Australia
  • Uganda
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119922023

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 52,874 current US$ per square kilometre against 50,381 current US$ per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 2,493 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uganda ahead.

Australia ranks 138th and Uganda ranks 137th of 190 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 5 and Uganda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 486.4 current US$ per square kilometre 894.95 current US$ per square kilometre 408.55 current US$ per square kilometre Uganda
1970s 1,545 current US$ per square kilometre 1,469 current US$ per square kilometre 76.12 current US$ per square kilometre Australia
1980s 4,284 current US$ per square kilometre 3,100 current US$ per square kilometre 1,185 current US$ per square kilometre Australia
1990s 8,718 current US$ per square kilometre 5,200 current US$ per square kilometre 3,519 current US$ per square kilometre Australia
2000s 18,508 current US$ per square kilometre 14,136 current US$ per square kilometre 4,372 current US$ per square kilometre Australia
2010s 38,498 current US$ per square kilometre 35,365 current US$ per square kilometre 3,133 current US$ per square kilometre Australia
2020s 41,888 current US$ per square kilometre 49,214 current US$ per square kilometre 7,327 current US$ per square kilometre Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imports of goods and services (current us$), per square kilometre, Australia or Uganda?
Uganda, at 52,874 current US$ per square kilometre against 50,381 current US$ per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in imports of goods and services (current us$), per square kilometre between Australia and Uganda?
2,493 current US$ per square kilometre, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Uganda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Uganda rank globally for imports of goods and services (current us$), per square kilometre?
Australia ranks 138th and Uganda ranks 137th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of goods and services (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Uganda: Imports of goods and services (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-current-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-current-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/uganda/">Australia vs Uganda: Imports of goods and services (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Imports of goods and services (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
235 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Imports of goods and services (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.