China vs Guatemala: Imports of goods and services (current LCU), per square kilometre

China
2.39 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala
2.42 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
116th
Guatemala rank
115th

Imports of goods and services (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • China
  • Guatemala
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M2.5M196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 2.42 million current LCU per square kilometre against 2.39 million current LCU per square kilometre in China, a difference of 27,290 current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guatemala ahead.

China ranks 116th and Guatemala ranks 115th of 190 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 2 and Guatemala in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Guatemala Difference Ahead
1960s 431.96 current LCU per square kilometre 2,220 current LCU per square kilometre 1,788 current LCU per square kilometre Guatemala
1970s 1,638 current LCU per square kilometre 8,744 current LCU per square kilometre 7,107 current LCU per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 11,928 current LCU per square kilometre 24,185 current LCU per square kilometre 12,256 current LCU per square kilometre Guatemala
1990s 88,498 current LCU per square kilometre 193,178 current LCU per square kilometre 104,680 current LCU per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 513,717 current LCU per square kilometre 774,227 current LCU per square kilometre 260,510 current LCU per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 1.44 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.35 million current LCU per square kilometre 91,158 current LCU per square kilometre China
2020s 2.15 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.06 million current LCU per square kilometre 87,738 current LCU per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imports of goods and services (current lcu), per square kilometre, China or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 2.42 million current LCU per square kilometre against 2.39 million current LCU per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in imports of goods and services (current lcu), per square kilometre between China and Guatemala?
27,290 current LCU per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Guatemala?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and Guatemala rank globally for imports of goods and services (current lcu), per square kilometre?
China ranks 116th and Guatemala ranks 115th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of goods and services (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Guatemala: Imports of goods and services (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/china/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/china/guatemala/">China vs Guatemala: Imports of goods and services (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Imports of goods and services (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 8,505 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Imports of goods and services (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.