Central African Republic vs Estonia: Imports of goods and services (current LCU), per square kilometre

Central African Republic
722,559 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Estonia
689,499 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
144th
Estonia rank
146th

Imports of goods and services (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Estonia
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k196119922023

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 722,559 current LCU per square kilometre against 689,499 current LCU per square kilometre in Estonia, a difference of 33,060 current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 144th and Estonia ranks 146th of 190 countries.

Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Estonia Difference Ahead
1990s 219,794 current LCU per square kilometre 65,239 current LCU per square kilometre 154,555 current LCU per square kilometre Central African Republic
2000s 262,917 current LCU per square kilometre 177,851 current LCU per square kilometre 85,066 current LCU per square kilometre Central African Republic
2010s 544,077 current LCU per square kilometre 364,490 current LCU per square kilometre 179,587 current LCU per square kilometre Central African Republic
2020s 734,868 current LCU per square kilometre 621,347 current LCU per square kilometre 113,522 current LCU per square kilometre Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imports of goods and services (current lcu), per square kilometre, Central African Republic or Estonia?
Central African Republic, at 722,559 current LCU per square kilometre against 689,499 current LCU per square kilometre in Estonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in imports of goods and services (current lcu), per square kilometre between Central African Republic and Estonia?
33,060 current LCU per square kilometre, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Estonia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Estonia rank globally for imports of goods and services (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Central African Republic ranks 144th and Estonia ranks 146th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of goods and services (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Estonia: Imports of goods and services (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/estonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/estonia/">Central African Republic vs Estonia: Imports of goods and services (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Imports of goods and services (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 8,505 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Imports of goods and services (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.