Botswana vs Peru: Imports of goods and services (current LCU), per square kilometre

Botswana
173,334 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Peru
186,082 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
175th
Peru rank
174th

Imports of goods and services (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • Peru
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196119922023

How they compare

Peru currently reports 186,082 current LCU per square kilometre against 173,334 current LCU per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 12,748 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 175th and Peru ranks 174th of 190 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 4 and Peru in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Peru Difference Ahead
1960s 32.28 current LCU per square kilometre 0 current LCU per square kilometre 32.28 current LCU per square kilometre Botswana
1970s 323.13 current LCU per square kilometre 0.0002 current LCU per square kilometre 323.13 current LCU per square kilometre Botswana
1980s 2,226 current LCU per square kilometre 0.8622 current LCU per square kilometre 2,225 current LCU per square kilometre Botswana
1990s 10,872 current LCU per square kilometre 13,802 current LCU per square kilometre 2,931 current LCU per square kilometre Peru
2000s 37,201 current LCU per square kilometre 43,289 current LCU per square kilometre 6,088 current LCU per square kilometre Peru
2010s 124,861 current LCU per square kilometre 110,669 current LCU per square kilometre 14,192 current LCU per square kilometre Botswana
2020s 172,845 current LCU per square kilometre 173,109 current LCU per square kilometre 264.25 current LCU per square kilometre Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imports of goods and services (current lcu), per square kilometre, Botswana or Peru?
Peru, at 186,082 current LCU per square kilometre against 173,334 current LCU per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in imports of goods and services (current lcu), per square kilometre between Botswana and Peru?
12,748 current LCU per square kilometre, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Peru?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Peru rank globally for imports of goods and services (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 175th and Peru ranks 174th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of goods and services (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Peru: Imports of goods and services (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/botswana/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/botswana/peru/">Botswana vs Peru: Imports of goods and services (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Imports of goods and services (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 8,505 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Imports of goods and services (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.