Ghana vs Zambia: Imports of goods and services (constant LCU), per capita
Ghana
1,618 constant LCU per person
in 2024
Zambia
2,149 constant LCU per person
in 2010
Ghana rank
168th
Zambia rank
166th
Imports of goods and services (constant LCU), per capita over time
- Ghana
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 2,149 constant LCU per person against 1,618 constant LCU per person in Ghana, a difference of 531 constant LCU per person.
That makes Zambia's figure about 1.3 times Ghana's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Ghana ranks 168th and Zambia ranks 166th of 179 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 853.13 constant LCU per person | 1,510 constant LCU per person | 656.38 constant LCU per person | Zambia |
| 2010s | 1,068 constant LCU per person | 2,149 constant LCU per person | 1,081 constant LCU per person | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher imports of goods and services (constant lcu), per capita, Ghana or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 2,149 constant LCU per person against 1,618 constant LCU per person in Ghana as of 2010.
- What is the difference in imports of goods and services (constant lcu), per capita between Ghana and Zambia?
- 531 constant LCU per person, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Zambia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2010.
- How do Ghana and Zambia rank globally for imports of goods and services (constant lcu), per capita?
- Ghana ranks 168th and Zambia ranks 166th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of goods and services (constant LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imports of goods and services (constant LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.