Iceland vs Uruguay: Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square

Iceland
104,070 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
96,948 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
105th
Uruguay rank
107th

Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Iceland
  • Uruguay
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k196119922023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 104,070 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 96,948 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Uruguay, a difference of 7,122 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Uruguay's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 105th and Uruguay ranks 107th of 169 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Uruguay Difference Ahead
1970s 22,181 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 11,250 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 10,931 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 32,039 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 13,306 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 18,733 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 38,725 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 28,240 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 10,486 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 65,080 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 40,865 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 24,215 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 76,062 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 74,552 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,510 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 92,178 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 84,589 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,589 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imports of goods and services (constant 2015 us$), per square, Iceland or Uruguay?
Iceland, at 104,070 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 96,948 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Uruguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in imports of goods and services (constant 2015 us$), per square between Iceland and Uruguay?
7,122 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Uruguay?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Uruguay rank globally for imports of goods and services (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Iceland ranks 105th and Uruguay ranks 107th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Uruguay: Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/iceland/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/iceland/uruguay/">Iceland vs Uruguay: Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 8,511 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.