Hungary vs Least developed countries: Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square

Hungary
1.58 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Least developed countries
19,668 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hungary rank
35th
Least developed countries rank
34th

Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Hungary
  • Least developed countries
0500.0k1.0M1.5M199120072023

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 1.58 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 19,668 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Least developed countries, a difference of 1.56 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hungary's figure about 80.4 times Least developed countries's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Hungary has been ahead every year.

Hungary ranks 35th and Least developed countries ranks 34th of 169 countries.

Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Least developed countries Difference Ahead
2000s 674,899 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 13,523 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 661,376 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Hungary
2010s 1.09 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 15,684 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.08 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Hungary
2020s 1.52 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 18,522 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.50 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imports of goods and services (constant 2015 us$), per square, Hungary or Least developed countries?
Hungary, at 1.58 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 19,668 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Least developed countries as of 2023.
What is the difference in imports of goods and services (constant 2015 us$), per square between Hungary and Least developed countries?
1.56 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Least developed countries?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Hungary and Least developed countries rank globally for imports of goods and services (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Hungary ranks 35th and Least developed countries ranks 34th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hungary vs Least developed countries: Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/hungary/least-developed-countries-un-classification/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/hungary/least-developed-countries-un-classification/">Hungary vs Least developed countries: Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 8,511 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.