Euro area vs Macao: Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square

Euro area
2.17 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Macao
705.28 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Euro area rank
1st
Macao rank
2nd

Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Euro area
  • Macao
0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M197019962023

How they compare

Macao currently reports 705.28 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 2.17 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Euro area, a difference of 703.11 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Macao's figure about 324.4 times Euro area's.

Across all 42 years both countries report, Macao has been ahead every year.

Euro area ranks 1st and Macao ranks 2nd of 36 groups.

Macao has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Euro area Macao Difference Ahead
1980s 506,050 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 126.69 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 126.19 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Macao
1990s 737,432 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 219.64 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 218.90 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Macao
2000s 1.26 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 282.30 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 281.05 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Macao
2010s 1.69 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 513.04 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 511.35 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Macao
2020s 2.08 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 626.74 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 624.67 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Macao

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imports of goods and services (constant 2015 us$), per square, Euro area or Macao?
Macao, at 705.28 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 2.17 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Euro area as of 2023.
What is the difference in imports of goods and services (constant 2015 us$), per square between Euro area and Macao?
703.11 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Macao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Euro area and Macao?
42 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2023.
How do Euro area and Macao rank globally for imports of goods and services (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Euro area ranks 1st and Macao ranks 2nd of 36 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Euro area vs Macao: Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/euro-area/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/euro-area/macao-sar-china/">Euro area vs Macao: Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 8,511 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.