Egypt vs Iceland: Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square

Egypt
107,548 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
104,070 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Egypt rank
104th
Iceland rank
105th

Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Egypt
  • Iceland
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k196119922023

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 107,548 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 104,070 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 3,478 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Iceland ahead.

Egypt ranks 104th and Iceland ranks 105th of 169 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 2 and Iceland in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Iceland Difference Ahead
1970s 9,894 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 22,181 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 12,287 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 16,687 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 32,039 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 15,352 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 19,747 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 38,725 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 18,979 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 40,633 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 65,080 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 24,446 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 80,283 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 76,062 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,221 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Egypt
2020s 96,158 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 92,178 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,981 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imports of goods and services (constant 2015 us$), per square, Egypt or Iceland?
Egypt, at 107,548 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 104,070 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in imports of goods and services (constant 2015 us$), per square between Egypt and Iceland?
3,478 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Iceland?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Egypt and Iceland rank globally for imports of goods and services (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Egypt ranks 104th and Iceland ranks 105th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Iceland: Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-goods-and-services-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/iceland/">Egypt vs Iceland: Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 8,511 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.